The Religion Of The Samurai

The Religion Of The Samurai – Kaiten Nukariya

This study of Zen philosophy and the disciples in China and Japan elaborates on the differences between Mahayana Buddhism and Theraveda. The Zen sect is one of many Buddhist sects and has millions of followers worldwide.

The Religion Of The Samurai

The Religion Of The Samurai

Format: Paperback.

The Religion Of The Samurai.

ISBN: 9783849676131.

Available at amazon.com and other venues.

 

Doctrine of the Samurai (from wikipedia.com)

In the 13th century, Hōjō Shigetoki (1198–1261 AD) wrote: “When one is serving officially or in the master’s court, he should not think of a hundred or a thousand people, but should consider only the importance of the master.” Carl Steenstrup noted that 13th and 14th century warrior writings (gunki) “portrayed the bushi in their natural element, war, eulogizing such virtues as reckless bravery, fierce family pride, and selfless, at times senseless devotion of master and man”. Feudal lords such as Shiba Yoshimasa (1350–1410) stated that a warrior looked forward to a glorious death in the service of a military leader or the Emperor: “It is a matter of regret to let the moment when one should die pass by … First, a man whose profession is the use of arms should think and then act upon not only his own fame, but also that of his descendants. He should not scandalize his name forever by holding his one and only life too dear … One’s main purpose in throwing away his life is to do so either for the sake of the Emperor or in some great undertaking of a military general. It is that exactly that will be the great fame of one’s descendants.”

In 1412 AD, Imagawa Sadayo wrote a letter of admonishment to his brother stressing the importance of duty to one’s master. Imagawa was admired for his balance of military and administrative skills during his lifetime, and his writings became widespread. The letters became central to Tokugawa-era laws and became required study material for traditional Japanese until World War II:

“First of all, a samurai who dislikes battle and has not put his heart in the right place even though he has been born in the house of the warrior, should not be reckoned among one’s retainers … It is forbidden to forget the great debt of kindness one owes to his master and ancestors and thereby make light of the virtues of loyalty and filial piety … It is forbidden that one should … attach little importance to his duties to his master … There is a primary need to distinguish loyalty from disloyalty and to establish rewards and punishments.”

Similarly, the feudal lord Takeda Nobushige (1525–1561) stated: “In matters both great and small, one should not turn his back on his master’s commands … One should not ask for gifts or enfiefments from the master … No matter how unreasonably the master may treat a man, he should not feel disgruntled … An underling does not pass judgments on a superior.”

Nobushige’s brother Takeda Shingen (1521–1573) also made similar observations: “One who was born in the house of a warrior, regardless of his rank or class, first acquaints himself with a man of military feats and achievements in loyalty … Everyone knows that if a man doesn’t hold filial piety toward his own parents he would also neglect his duties toward his lord. Such a neglect means a disloyalty toward humanity. Therefore such a man doesn’t deserve to be called ‘samurai’.”

The feudal lord Asakura Yoshikage (1428–1481) wrote: “In the fief of the Asakura, one should not determine hereditary chief retainers. A man should be assigned according to his ability and loyalty.” Asakura also observed that the successes of his father were obtained by the kind treatment of the warriors and common people living in domain. By his civility, “all were willing to sacrifice their lives for him and become his allies.”

Katō Kiyomasa was one of the most powerful and well-known lords of the Sengoku period. He commanded most of Japan’s major clans during the invasion of Korea (1592–1598). In a handbook he addressed to “all samurai, regardless of rank”, he told his followers that a warrior’s only duty in life was to “grasp the long and the short swords and to die”. He also ordered his followers to put forth great effort in studying the military classics, especially those related to loyalty and filial piety. He is best known for his quote: “If a man does not investigate into the matter of Bushido daily, it will be difficult for him to die a brave and manly death. Thus it is essential to engrave this business of the warrior into one’s mind well.”

Nabeshima Naoshige (1538–1618 AD) was another Sengoku daimyō who fought alongside Kato Kiyomasa in Korea. He stated that it was shameful for any man to have not risked his life at least once in the line of duty, regardless of his rank. Nabeshima’s sayings would be passed down to his son and grandson and would become the basis for Tsunetomo Yamamoto’s Hagakure. He is best known for his saying “The way of the Samurai is in desperateness. Ten men or more cannot kill such a man.”

Torii Mototada (1539–1600) was a feudal lord in the service of Tokugawa Ieyasu. On the eve of the battle of Sekigahara, he volunteered to remain behind in the doomed Fushimi Castle while his lord advanced to the east. Torii and Tokugawa both agreed that the castle was indefensible. In an act of loyalty to his lord, Torii chose to remain behind, pledging that he and his men would fight to the finish. As was custom, Torii vowed that he would not be taken alive. In a dramatic last stand, the garrison of 2,000 men held out against overwhelming odds for ten days against the massive army of Ishida Mitsunari’s 40,000 warriors. In a moving last statement to his son Tadamasa, he wrote:

“It is not the Way of the Warrior [i.e., bushidō] to be shamed and avoid death even under circumstances that are not particularly important. It goes without saying that to sacrifice one’s life for the sake of his master is an unchanging principle. That I should be able to go ahead of all the other warriors of this country and lay down my life for the sake of my master’s benevolence is an honor to my family and has been my most fervent desire for many years.”

It is said that both men cried when they parted ways, because they knew they would never see each other again. Torii’s father and grandfather had served the Tokugawa before him and his own brother had already been killed in battle. Torii’s actions changed the course of Japanese history. Ieyasu Tokugawa would successfully raise an army and win at Sekigahara.

The translator of Hagakure, William Scott Wilson observed examples of warrior emphasis on death in clans other than Yamamoto’s: “he (Takeda Shingen) was a strict disciplinarian as a warrior, and there is an exemplary story in the Hagakure relating his execution of two brawlers, not because they had fought, but because they had not fought to the death”.

The rival of Takeda Shingen (1521–1573) was Uesugi Kenshin (1530–1578), a legendary Sengoku warlord well-versed in the Chinese military classics and who advocated the “way of the warrior as death”. Japanese historian Daisetz Teitaro Suzuki describes Uesugi’s beliefs as: “Those who are reluctant to give up their lives and embrace death are not true warriors … Go to the battlefield firmly confident of victory, and you will come home with no wounds whatever. Engage in combat fully determined to die and you will be alive; wish to survive in the battle and you will surely meet death. When you leave the house determined not to see it again you will come home safely; when you have any thought of returning you will not return. You may not be in the wrong to think that the world is always subject to change, but the warrior must not entertain this way of thinking, for his fate is always determined.”

Families such as the Imagawa were influential in the development of warrior ethics and were widely quoted by other lords during their lifetime. The writings of Imagawa Sadayo were highly respected and sought out by Tokugawa Ieyasu as the source of Japanese Feudal Law. These writings were a required study among traditional Japanese until World War II.

Historian H. Paul Varley notes the description of Japan given by Jesuit leader St. Francis Xavier (1506–1552): “There is no nation in the world which fears death less.” Xavier further describes the honour and manners of the people: “I fancy that there are no people in the world more punctilious about their honour than the Japanese, for they will not put up with a single insult or even a word spoken in anger.” Xavier spent the years 1549–1551 converting Japanese to Christianity. He also observed: “The Japanese are much braver and more warlike than the people of China, Korea, Ternate and all of the other nations around the Philippines.”

 

(The text of the last section was taken from a Wikipedia entry and is available under the the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License.)

 

Publisher’s Note: This book is printed and distributed by Createspace a DBA of On-Demand Publishing LLC and is typically not available anywhere else than in stores owned and operated by Amazon or Createspace.

Dieser Beitrag wurde unter Buddhism, The Sacred Books (English) veröffentlicht. Setze ein Lesezeichen auf den Permalink.

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht.